Washington Soil Health Initiative Roadmap

Cross-Cutting Results from Roadmap Efforts

1
results

Photo: Sullivan

Each focus area unearthed different perspectives and feedback, but there were common themes between focus areas, detailed below. Additionally, across focus areas there was a common emphasis on the need for production system-specific research, outreach and technical support, optimization of soil health metrics, and incentive programs.

Goals and Priorities

Description: Positive soil health outcomes achieved through action.

  • Soil health measurements and metrics that are standardized, inexpensive, and easily deployed.
  • Easy access to equipment that maintains soil health (e.g., no-till seeder).
  • Improved knowledge of soil health specific to production systems.
  • Improved information dissemination to agricultural professionals and producers.
  • Greater valuation of soil health in the marketplace.
  • Protection of existing soil organic matter, and future increase in soil organic matter levels.
  • Tillage is minimized where applicable and is well-timed and strategic.
  • General public understands and values soil health.

Research Priorities

The top five soil health related research priorities for this group are:

  • Develop better tools and strategies for managing challenging soilborne pests.
  • Develop strategies to effectively use reduced tillage in organic production.
  • Develop metrics for measuring soil health (including carbon sequestration).
  • More research on cover crop combos and termination methods.
  • More information needed on managing common soil issues in western Washington: soil compaction, wet soils, soil pH.

Soil Health Issues

Description: Prioritized soil health issues.

  • Soil pH.
  • Soil tilth.
  • Soil compaction.
  • Nutrient cycling.
  • Wind and water erosion of soils.
  • Water-holding capacity.
  • Soilborne plant diseases.
  • Tillage requirements for certain crops limit that ability to reduce soil disturbance.
  • Poor soil structure that results in drainage issues/flooding and limits field access.
2

Milestones

Description: Specific metrics that gauge progress towards the above listed soil health goals.

Short-Term (1 to 5 years)

  • Establish a network of soil health research sites across the state that generate and disseminate soil health information.
  • Identify management practices to increase soil water holding capacity.
  • Increase landowner incentive programs by 30%.
  • Increase knowledge of soil health by farmers, agricultural professionals, and the public.
  • Hire three soil health-focused researchers for tree fruit, grapes, and Columbia Basin irrigated systems.
  • Increase enrollment in incentive programs that pay landowners to utilize management practices that sequester carbon.
  • Increase soil carbon levels.
  • Reduce soil erosion rates.
  • Position Washington as the preeminent state deploying soil health efforts and providing guidance to other states to follow suit.

Medium-Term (5 to 10 years)

  • Identify production system specific practices production system specific practices that build soil health on farms with degraded soils. Washington Soil Health Initiative
  • Allow farmers and consultants to efficiently track soil health conditions through production system specific metrics.

Long-Term (10 to 20 years)

  • Rebuild soil organic matter levels to pre-tillage levels.
  • Reduce soil erosion rates to represent pre-cultivation rates.
  • Increase adoption of practices that suppress or provide resistance to soilborne diseases particularly in perennial production systems. 
  • Farmers can deploy targeted soil health practices to overcome problems based on production systems specific metrics.
  • Improve nutrient cycling.
3

Information Gaps

Description: Gaps in soil health understanding and knowledge.

  • Several respondents across focus areas noted the lack of a universal definition for soil health. Agencies such as the NRCS has provided a definition that is used widely. Either there is a lack of the awareness of this definition, or respondents that made this comment don’t agree with it, or soil health metrics are perceived as a definition of soil health.
  • Understanding of soil biology.
  • Information to translate the current state of soil health knowledge to practical agronomic decisions.
  • Understanding of soil health in overall ecosystem function.
  • Relationship between soil health and food quality.
  • Return on investment (ROI) of soil health practices.

Barriers to Adoption of Soil Health Practices

Description: Barriers prevent the adoption of actions (e.g., management practices, policies) to protect or improve soil health.

  • Soils are inherently complex.
  • Lack of clarity and consistency of soil health sampling and metrics. Soil health metrics and expected measurement values vary across geography, production systems, and users.
  • There is often a weak connection between soil health indicators and economic and environmental outcomes.
  • Soil health-promoting practices can lead to unintended consequences (e.g., increased weed pressure and herbicide resistance).
  • Producers do not have a good understanding of return on investment of deploying soil health practices.
  • Lack of local technical support to deliver production system-specific recommendations. 
  • Producers are paid to produce crops not to undertake soil health practices, especially in commodity markets.
  • Complex, time-consuming incentive programs.
  • Complexity of crop rotations.
  • Difficulty of investing in soil health practices for leased land.
  • Costs associated with soil health practices.
  • Logistics of using practices that improve soil health.
  • Difficulty of incorporating soil health practices in perennial production systems.

Overcoming the Barriers

Description: Actions (e.g., incentive programs, policy) that would help to overcome the previously 99listed barriers to adoption.

  • Financial incentives for soil health practices that appropriately cover costs.
  • Stable, long-term research that connects economic and environmental benefits.
  • Increased agency and University capacity and expertise in soil health.
  • Implementation of soil health practices needs to be coupled with monitoring.
  • Education efforts should simultaneously target K-12, College/University, and landowners and emphasize technical communication.
4

Soil Health Policies

Description: Are there specific state policies that could increase adoption of management practices that improve soil health?

  • Incentive programs that reduce the risk for farmer experimentation, provide direct payments for practices that are known to improve soil health, and are not complex or burdensome to farmers.
  • Resources available for farmers to try soil health practices.
  • Taxes on fertilizers, carbon, and soil erosion.

Resources, Tools, and Opportunities

Description: Resources/tools/opportunities that could help advance soil health goals.

  • Evaluation of soil health indicators across production systems.
  • Coordination with other states and regions.
  • Grant dollars from Federal, State, and commodity commissions. 
  • Technical support with expertise in soil health.

Investment Areas

Description: Strategic investments (e.g., personnel capacity) that could improve soil health knowledge and/or adoption. Washington Soil Health Initiative

  • Quantify the value of services provided by soil health improving practices (e.g., crop rotations, cover crops, amendments).
  • University research and extension capacity in soil health.
  • Funding for long-term experiments that evaluate soil health practices.
  • Reliable, simple, universal soil health assessment tools.
  • An effective tool to assess soil carbon at scale. •
  • Inclusion of socioeconomic aspects in soil health research.